87 vs 91 octane fuel

Always interested in hearing about exploring new territory.

Hope it works out and exceeds your expectations.

Please keep us posted -- details and photos welcome.
 

You experienced just the reverse of most of us. Since Triumph is a "foreign" maker, most of the units are in European standard including the fuel rating in RON instead of the USA standard of (R+M)/2 (also known as AKI or PON). Since your Indian is a USA manufacturer, the units are expressed in USA standards. So you are correct in that the international standard of 91 RON is roughly equivalent to the USA standard regular of 87 PON/AKI.
 
I like to make gas references in terms of Regular, Mid-Grade and Premium (some call it Super). That is generally understood internationally. In the USA, Regular is typically 87 octane (slightly lower in high altitude western states) as measured using the (R+M)/2 method. Internationally Regular is 91 octane using the RON standard. Similar values exist for the other grades.

Higher octane has an effect on the propagation of the flame front within the cylinder. The higher the octane, the slower the propagation. The goal is to get as complete fuel burn as possible thus liberating the most potential energy in a controlled manner within the cylinder. Too fast of propagation can result in an uncontrolled explosion, aka detonation. Too slow of propagation results in unburnt fuel spilling out the exhaust system. The unburnt fuel obviously does not release its potential energy (ie heat) thus the reason for "running cooler".

In the age of electronic fuel injection, it is important to match the fuel type, fuel quantity, and compression with the airflow in order to achieve complete combustion without detonation. The EFI tune controls that mixture. Changing any factor in that equation will result in less than optimal conditions.

just my 2c.