Dynotune Results - 2010 Roadster + RamAir

[cusso ken]

He He

How did you find Jamie at Sports Cycle ,I don't usually recommend people for Bike/Car or Truck work but have found Jamie excellent, its as stated before the Difference between Touring and Roadster is in the tune my Touring is of simular Mods but only has a K&N in stock filter box, and is only minutely less across the range and identical power/torque curves

 

[Scuba Craig]

Jamie was pretty good to deal with Ken. Thanks for the pointer.

5 hours and 120+ km on the dyno. He's a real perfectionist. There was a couple of areas that were causing him some issues and he kept persevering until he got the results.

 

[cusso ken]

I am glad, and he is very popular with the high performance bike owners, and big dollar racers,

 

[Scuba Craig]

He had a great collection of bikes on-site. Mostly HD's and big block cruisers. Much more interesting to look around than your average Jap bike dealer.

 

[BCRedHaze]

Is there a repository on this site for all these different tunes? I have the same setup on a'12 Roadster and I am running the Power-Tripp Slip On Tune but would be interested in trying a tune that is more specific for my setup.

 

[Jabol]

Not bad results considering only spending $500 in accessories to get the extra 20 horsepower and 10 ft/lbs of torque. On a motorcycle thats pretty respectable IMHO.

 

[Torque addict]

What happened between 1650 and 2100 rpm? Looks like you lost some power there. I would not be happy with that unless of course it's not noticeable. The rest looks like a nice increase though.

 

[Scuba Craig]

Is there a repository on this site for all these different tunes? I have the same setup on a'12 Roadster and I am running the Power-Tripp Slip On Tune but would be interested in trying a tune that is more specific for my setup.

The TuneECU site has a vast library of tunes ...

Also, @HansO has a good collection of modified maps. PM him.

What happened between 1650 and 2100 rpm? Looks like you lost some power there. I would not be happy with that unless of course it's not noticeable. The rest looks like a nice increase though.

It's not noticeable from a loss-of-power point of view. It's such a narrow band of revs that you pass through it pretty quickly if you are riding in racing-mode. I found the bike a bit peaky in that area so I asked the tuner to smooth it out a bit. It now fits the rest of the power curve nicely.

 

[cusso ken]

Jamie opened the fuel taps slightly across the whole range on my Touring and I now use around .5 to 1 litre extra per 100 k,the Standard Touring tune with TORS and K&N had already picked up 10HP before the remap, I picked up another 30HP after the Tune,40HP overall ,a Huge difference on the Touring's Restricted figures ,the Roadsters are already up there and more power is harder to fossick out as He said the first 30HP is relatively easy to find but great results anyhow ,

 

[IMFASTTOO]

Jamie opened the fuel taps slightly across the whole range on my Touring and I now use around .5 to 1 litre extra per 100 k,the Standard Touring tune with TORS and K&N had already picked up 10HP before the remap, I picked up another 30HP after the Tune,40HP overall ,a Huge difference on the Touring's Restricted figures ,the Roadsters are already up there and more power is harder to fossick out as He said the first 30HP is relatively easy to find but great results anyhow ,

HEY you can get 170 HP if you go with a good pipe and intake