PeteOZ
Supercharged
I hope at the end we don't all just pick the bits from the article we like as its the objective findings that are most relevant. As I've said before, personal opinions are good but not a sound basis for such an important decision.
The best outcome will not be whether CTs are OK or better or worse, but that the discussion and the article provide a catalist for some sensible consideration by bike and tire manufacturers of the real needs of this large and apparently growing segment of the motorcycle market.
Unfortunately Canberra, it's human nature to pick bits from statistics and research that support our own biased views, so I'm afraid your fears will be realised in some way.
However, I the review will NOT nominate a "winner", but will simply provide the catalyst you mention above. Who knows, maybe some smart tyre exec who is surreptitiously monitoring this thread will see a potential market in producing a motorcycle tyre with a longer life, well balanced tread for the cruising/touring market (hey, there goes another flying pig now)
Thanks for crediting me with starting the thread, but that credit should really go to the editor (Peter Thoemig) who was the catalyst for my original post. His willingness to take on what is reported here as being a taboo topic for many US mags speaks volumes for his principles (probably not the right word, but I'm on my second glass of red ......
Pete