Be seen!

[barbagris]

I do now at old age.

Glasses wearers tend to scan using their neck - non glasses wearers move their eyes.

 

[Grumpy Ole Codger]

And you never noticed.

Sun was little bright that day...

 

[barbagris]

Sun was little bright that day...

For an hour or so.

 

[Grumpy Ole Codger]

For an hour or so.

But you were also behind me all the time...

 

[barbagris]

But you were also behind me all the time...

Had I been in front - how would you have seen the white reflecting stuff that faced forwards?

 

[Grumpy Ole Codger]

Had I been in front - how would you have seen the white reflecting stuff that faced forwards?

Well there are 3 factors to consider. 1. Bright sunshine - no can see! 2. So far behind the superior Blue machine - no can see. 3. In front??? That's just not possible either!

 

[barbagris]

Well there are 3 factors to consider. 1. Bright sunshine - no can see! 2. So far behind the superior Blue machine - no can see. 3. In front??? That's just not possible either!

And one other - Blind as a 'kin bat!.

 

[Grumpy Ole Codger]

And one other - Blind as a 'kin bat!.

 

[1olbull]

Glasses wearers tend to scan using their neck - non glasses wearers move their eyes.

Amigo,
Scan yes (one direction), saccade (back and forth) I reckon not likely.

 

[barbagris]

Amigo,
Scan yes (one direction), saccade (back and forth) I reckon not likely.

It's even less likely if they have progressive lenses. I saccade fine without my reading glasses on. And with the "never to be repeated" progressives I have to move my head or that I wish to see into the area of focus. My point is - glasses wears probably saccade far far less.