I have designed cooling systems for years... and have a pretty good understanding of how they work.. and how to alter them for just about any sitution. I even write web site based (for example of one see here...
http://www.streetrodstuff.com/Articles/ ... ggestions/ .... and media (magazine) based tech articles on cooling (and other techy stuff) professionally.. mostly in the high performance markets.. but also have some aircraft articles as well. I offer my ideas on this... if anyone wants to try this.
First information. The Rocket III cooling system employs a downflow radiator. Because your coolant naturally expands when heated.. you need somewhere for that expanded coolant to go. This is where the "overflow" bottle comes into play and the perverbial "hot" and "cold" level marks commonly found on any bottle.
If you fill the radiator full to the cap... and don't allow any expansion space the expansion when the coolant pool expands will violate the cap (because you cannot compress water!!) and the pressure at the cap will always override the cap's pressure rating! By employing the vented cap.. this allows the coolant to expand to the bottle.
If you look at older style downflow radiators.. there was a large holding tank on top. This tank did NOTHING for cooling, but when you filled the radiator.. ... one left about a 1" space in the top of the tank when filled... to allow for that expansion compression. Hence.... no overflow needed.
If the Rocket had a top tank.. it tooo would need no expansion tank with a non-vented regular pressure cap in tact. The coolant in the system would ebb and flow inside the top tank with natural expansion.
Now.. the reason the overflow bottle is designed into the Rocket's cooling system is because the radiator does NOT have any expansion tank... and moreover they MUST need the top of the radiator footprint to adequately cool the Rocket in severe situations. If one dropped the coolant level in the radiator about 1/2" would this suffice for a "natural" expansion area and moveover eliminate the overflow tank completely! I would say in most cases this could be done.. but I have not tried it... and would have to play with it to see just how much of an effect this really has????
So, back to the coolant bottle. In my opinion.. the coolant bottle could be easily downsized to another model or even footprint as long as the cap of the overflow is kept above the "pool" level of the coolant when fully expanded. Otherwise... it will expell on the floor! So, there are choices out there for easier and prettier overflow bottles.
For example, something like this pictured here.
or...something like this mounted externally on a downtube somewhere??
Here are a couple of "universal" models to think about.
The bottom line here is that you can use almost ANYTHING .. even a wiskey flask if you can connect it ... and it has enough expansion space below the "pool" level when expanded. And, you can really leave the overflow empty (when at cold levels) and reduce the overall expanded "pool" to just take up room when hot. So, you would NOT see any coolant in the bottle when cold. This does NOT affect the volume of the pool in the radiator.... or it's ability to cool.
The way to find out how much expansion volume is needed it simply take the overflow and measure the difference in volume between the hot and cold lines! This will be just about all the volume you would need for an effective overflow tank regardless.
Just toooooooooooo much information.. I know! But, interesting idea I think all will agree!
I think I will try a small billet "hotrod" tank somewhere in the near future and report back when accomplished.