Jamie
Living Legend
Some forum natives might remember that I went the engine tuning route on my standard (pre-"Roadster") Rocket, pretty much on my own. Pistons, cams, triple K&N's, Mad Dog cans and various Power Commander e:tuning experiments by a pro. Peak horsepower increased from 139 to 174, both dyno-tested, i.e. by 25% @ the same rpm level. But the Rocket felt as if it had lost a geat deal of its torque, at least below 4'000 rpm's, in the tuning process. It became ... unpleasant to ride outside of empty country roads. In urban areas, it also required far more clutching than one would expect from 2'300cc, tuning notwithstanding. Fuel starvation also became an occasional irritant north of 5'500 rpm's. OK, I was a tuning apprentice (which Carpenter is obviously not!) back then and probably lost patience too soon... but 4-5 years later my conclusion is: Never again!
Don't mean to read like a show-stopper. Just wish to submit that, money aside, tuning the Rocket engine necessarily entails trade-offs and that these trade-offs are worth considering beforehand.
Regards. Jamie
Don't mean to read like a show-stopper. Just wish to submit that, money aside, tuning the Rocket engine necessarily entails trade-offs and that these trade-offs are worth considering beforehand.
Regards. Jamie
Last edited: