Tune for stripped+modified R3 Touring?

Hardy

.040 Over
Joined
May 9, 2010
Messages
97
Location
Homburg-Saar - Germany
Well - I did a lot of things now on my Triumph Touring (See some of the mods on my homepage: Rocket DIY
- GIPro with ATRE installed
- CO2 Sensor installed
- Catalysator gone
- Airbox gone
- K+N Triple Filter installed
- Triumph TOR's installed
- Secondaries gone
- TUNecu Mapping

But after Dyno the result is more or less dissilusioning. Just close to 120 BHP. Some of my friends are close to 150 BHP. I am using the 20366 with secondaries opened to 100%
The power is good up to 3000rpm, but then it flatens. The Dynomen said it should be a bit richer above 3000 rpm.

I wonder which Map you ride? And if you have dynoed it?

my dyno result
 
My guess would be that your exhaust is the limiting factor, along with probably needing some more fuel up top. For the R3T the only option I'm aware of for the exhaust is Jardine. In my Sig line you can see my dyno results from triple filters, Jardines, and tune. I used Tuneboy, so I can't say what's available in a TuneECU tune.

Also, different dynos will yield very different results. Comparing your results to others is not always valid.
 
Did your friends do their dyno tests on the same dyno? There can be a huge range among dynos. I got 140 hp on my bike with TORs and a K&N under seat (with no snorkel) using this tune:

20050DynoFinalMap_TOR_CatBypass_Decel.hex

if you have TORs and triple filters, try this tune 20050DynoFinalMap_WithPods_And_IgnRetard.hex

This came from Tuneboy and claims 151 hp. But this was done in Australia.

Both of these tunes have the secondaries open 100%.
 
Thx Brothers,

My bike is a Touring. So the normal Power is 106 BHP. I am comparing only with Touring modells.

Dougl you are right. The mappings are from different dynos. But I will check and try with the other files.

Thank you so far.

Hardy
 
I think it's the same engine. Here is my dyno run from 2006. The top curves are for a the modified 20050 tune with secondaries open. The bottom 2 are for the stock tune for TORs. The only big differences is in the low end loss of power from closing the secondaries in the stock tune. Note how smooth the curves are. Your curve looks gnarly. Are you sure it's running on all 3 cylinders?
 

Attachments

  • Yuill_Bros082406.jpg
    215 KB · Views: 127
Yeah, your dyno chart looks a little strange. The line should be smooth, not sure why you have all the dips. Did they also give you a print out of the A/F ratio? That may be interesting.

The Touring model can not use maps from other models, the tables are different. If you try, you'll find they won't load.
 
GPMAZ answered the main issue.

the touring has the same engine but all other adjustments are different because of the different conception.

Regarding the Dyno. I think that the machine sliped on the drum. (Maybe to much torque). Nope I dont have the A/F printout. I think I should go to a other dyno to verify things.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Unable to register tune ECU Via Paypal and Wise. Is TuneECU dead and gone? Alternatives I could use?
Replies
6
Views
164
atomsplitter
Tune for an early Rocket
2
Replies
15
Views
1K
Rocket Scientist
R3T which tune?
Replies
0
Views
344
Jotl1000
Tune ECU wont connect
2
Replies
15
Views
1K
Mongler07
Tune ECU Map
2
Replies
11
Views
2K
Kevin frazier
Menu
Log in
Register