SAI delete

I like your last sentence! What about mapped bikes with aftermarket headers/pipes? Any potential for valve damage? Does Triumph (or any other manufacturer) add EPA/Euro 5 devices to their race bikes to gain “fuel efficiency?” Or power? Hmm…

If a Triumph dealership had two Rockets sitting there that looked exactly the same but one had zero emission nannies and a little sign, (For track use only) I know which one I would buy. Karen heads around the globe would explode.
@dougl
 
Last edited:
Of course you can ruin the engine. I don’t get your point about racing. There’s still racing, no?
 
dougl said:
Of course you can ruin the engine. I don’t get your point about racing. There’s still racing, no?
Click to expand...
I already have aftermarket Vandemon pipes and map/dyno but I will be getting larger headers/pipes soon. I want to make it the most efficient/srong/happy engine without any regards to mpg or emissions. But not at the risk of damaging the engine. If that can be done leaving the o2 sensor/cannisters/EPA stuff in place, great! But all that stuff seems to compromise engine power for the sake of emission compliance. Hence, my racing analogy. If they were getting the same power and even better mpg they would all be adding that stuff. Weight issue, maybe? I doubt it but that’s why I’m trying to learn how to achieve the best results with this engine. Would Triumph add all of that stuff to an engine if there was no Euro5/EPA constraints? How much power does it actually rob? I have no idea.
 
So when you get the new headers, you need to get it dynoed again, right?. I don’t think the O2 sensor, SAI or EVAP limit max power. How would they do that? We know that derestricting the electronic throttle gives a ton of additional max power. You might want to remove the O2 sensor and SAI to reduce popping on decel. I’m not arguing that anyone shouldn’t remove this stuff from their bikes. I’ve done it.
 
Excellent! Yes, back to the dyno. More power and getting rid of the popping would be great and if I can accomplish that while just leaving that other stuff alone would be even better! Thanks!
 
Did you remove the cat? How much popping are you getting?
 
dougl said:
Did you remove the cat? How much popping are you getting?
Click to expand...
No cat, and it’s not purring (yeah, I went there) but it definitely will “pop,pop..pop…pop…..pop” getting further apart as it decelerates. It’s not really annoying but I would be fine with less or totally gone.
 
Nashvegas said:
No cat, and it’s not purring (yeah, I went there) but it definitely will “pop,pop..pop…pop…..pop” getting further apart as it decelerates. It’s not really annoying but I would be fine with less or totally gone.
Click to expand...
The popping is caused by ignition of unburned fuel in the exhaust. Adding air, as SAI does, makes the burn hotter, so this increases popping. Do, get rid of SAI. I found that the O2 sensor accentuated decel popping on my 2005 Rocket. So I removed it and this helped. I had a full Jardine exhaust and triple filters on my 2007 Rocket. The popping was explosive. Even after I had it dyno tuned with a Power Commander 3. The popping thing is common on bikes with open exhausts. I saw a Dynojet video where they suggested adding fuel at closed throttle which is where popping occurs. Adding more fuel makes the mixture cooler in the exhaust to the point where it won’t ignite. I did this myself and the popping stopped. You could install a Power Commandet 6 and do this yourself. Trying to add fuel at closed throttle with Tuneecu is problematic. That’s because the ECU is using manifold pressure, not throttle position to do the fueling at closed throttle. You could try adding fuel in the L tables at low pressure. If anyone has done this successfully, I’d like to know.
 
I will tell Konrad, the Tunemeister, about the popping when the headers get made. I bet he will know what to do.
 
Last edited:
After switching to Power Vision on my Harleys (FXDWG and FLHXSE2) I can assure you that, apart from going to the bench (well done...), it is the best system for adapting the ECU of an engine to various hardware modifications but also to your driving conditions (ambient temperature, humidity, altitude, etc.). There is even an auto-tune option for guys who are not used to the tool. It's a shame that this doesn't exist for the Rocket because this tool allows you to touch almost all the injection and ignition tables, modify the displacement, take information for the tachometer, etc. For the moment, the best quality/price ratio is still Tune Ecu with Penner maps...
With Power Vision, no more "pop" when decelerating and a closed loop retained for constant speeds which allows you to have low consumption while having maximum power the rest of the time... Too bad Dynojet does not offer it for the Roclet 3!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register