Beauty is in the eye of the beholder

Even tho i never owned a 900 Ninja, it had a lot to do woth me getting into motorcycling, it was the sexiest bike on the road, to my eyes anyway
 
In their description of the Honda CB400F, they were wrong in saying the CB350F was only produced for one year. It was actually produced in '72, '73, and '74. Their description of the R3 is exactly how I feel about every Harley I've ever seen...Nothing flows, and everything looks like it was bolted on as an afterthought...
 

I had a V65 as well. I was not a corner burner, but in a straight line it was unbelievably fast for the time...it was not as fast as the 900 Ninja tho...
 
Last edited:
LAS VEGAS DAVE said:
I like the way the Rocket looks, I like the way my Boss Hoss looks, I like the way the new Indians look, the guy might like fat chicks with corrective stockings and a mustache, we all have different opinions of what looks good.
Click to expand...
Don't judge man!
 
Both the BSA Rocket and Triumph Trident looked like crap the first year but by 1971 they both looked fine. A Rune pulled up next to me at a light and it looked cool.
 
WELL everyone has reasons for liking a certain bike and thats an opinion and some are ugly to others but thats why they make all these different bikes and you choose the ones you like and dislike so whats the big deal thats never going to change so stop whining and carry on with the discussion
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

The Latest US Motorcycle Death Statistics Are Out
2
Replies
15
Views
473
mo8414
HONDA's latest = the 'leaf blower turbo' is back!
Replies
2
Views
1K
Jagster
For Fred- the secret buyer?
Replies
1
Views
578
Rocket Scientist
Lupe's ultimate Vespa is in Australia - who knew?
2
Replies
15
Views
2K
mexican
Harley-Davidson Custom Shop Plays With the Triumph Rocket
Replies
2
Views
627
stingray
Menu
Log in
Register