Rocket Roadster, Corbin bags and fairing, luggage rack, big Kuryakyn or Saddlemen bag. Good looking, has all the luggage capacity you need and goes like stink. And doesn't have an eyesore of a top box (not a fan in general).
I hated the tank mounted gauges on my Touring at first but now they're a non-issue. I just glance down on occasion to see how much too fast I'm going or what the time is or my fuel status to empty. Moving your eyes down to the bars or a little lower to the tank isn't that different, at the end of the day. It's not like you spend any time looking at the gauges when you ride. But of course, just one man's opinion. And as for revs, I don't really care. It's going to be somewhere between 1000 and 6000 and that's all the precision I need aside from "butt-feel". :-D
Frankly, I think if you're
that dead set against the tank-mounted gauges then you should start with a Roadster. It's much easier to bolt on the stuff you need on that than start slashing at the wiring harness on the Touring. Anything can be done if you're determined, but it would probably be non-trivial.
Power-wise it's almost a wash. The Touring with the freely available derestricting tune gets you to about 140 horses, so almost on par with the Roadster. The difference comes from the slightly more restricted exhaust. Replace the exhaust and the air filter and you can get the same power out of a Touring as you can a Roadster, and by that I mean you can get it to almost 300 hp naturally aspirated or more than that with forced induction of some kind.
As for how Touring bags look on a Classic:
R3 touring bags on a classic/roadster