Well thats one way to look at it. Saying a harley looks and sounds like every other bike on the road is like saying every muscle car sounds and looks like a mustang. Technically the mustang was first and all others copied its appeal. Harley's street glide and road glide are the only real hard baggers out there (in my opinion) that get things right. I am not a fan of the shark nose on the road glide (as pictured in the SS bike), the street glide batwing is better. Triumph doesn't make a bike that competes completely with the street glide/road glide. The touring r3 doesn't have a fairing/radio, is a much bigger bike that is harder for smaller people to ride. There is 0 aftermarket parts for the bike, minimal paint options, etc. The r3 touring is a great bike but I would buy a street glide over it due to better looks, but then again I would still have my roadster to play with.
I am all for harley bashing but my issue with harley is how they became a corporate sell out union busting money grubbing company. The bikes they make for the category they compete in are very nice, and are often above the competition in everything but the power end of things. However the power end of things is really a moot point since overall they produce power comparable to most other v-twins. I used to bash harley like what goes on here, but after riding a few touring bikes I came to realize they actually are quite nice. They are a bit overpriced but if I took a stock rocket at 16K and had the dealer put on 1,400$ wheels (which don't exist for a r3) , 2K for a custom paint job, 1,000$ hard bags, 1,600$ radio/speakers/front fairing, etc so the bike is more similar to a street glide, I am on the neighborhood of exactly what a street glide costs.
Personally I don't care what a guy spends his money on. 50K in a street glide is beyond anything I would ever do, but at the same time he has a bad ass bike that nobody else in the area has. Thats saying a lot since there are **** near a million harleys in town here every 5 years for the anniversary. He loves it, women love it, guys drool at it, and it sounds like a mean SOAB. I would ride the bike all day, and let people hate on it. I am not so stupid to spend that kind of money on any bike anyway, but its pretty bad ass for what it is.
We will try it one more time. The t-143 is a high performance engine. High performance V-twins are not built like your standard 96 cubic inch or 103 cubic inch. They are designed and built for speed. To gain that much horse power some thing has to give. The added stress on engine bearings ,primary components, and transmission leads to premature failure. There is no way around this. You accept this fact anytime you make a extreme build. If you believe that engine will last as many miles as a standard 103 good luck with that. Hell look at the warranty that comes with that engine it is a joke. almost forgot my car has a radio and windshield but my bike does not. No cupholders either wow i must really live in the dark ages??????
That can be said of any engine built over stock. V-twins are not designed for high HP and longevity, you can have one or the other. However the guy has 10K miles on the motor and it seems to be holding up just fine. A lot of big cube v-twins have a bad rap because of the idiots putting them together. Atleast 3 130+ cube motors amoung my coworkers have been scragged in the last 3 years. Idiot builder + some good some junk parts = blown up engine. Warranty is a joke on performance parts period. Talk with even carpenter and see what he has to say about replacing a engine for free on a r3 when a guy blows up from drag racing it. Like it or not v-twin engines cost big dollars to build. They will never make massive power like you can with inline motors, but they are fun in their own right.