DYNO FIGURES 270?

blowme

.040 Over
Joined
May 11, 2006
Messages
80
We've been fitting a lot of R3 supercharger kits lately. last week we fitted a kit to a vertually new 700 mile old bike. It performed quite well with 235 corrected (.98 ) bhp on our Dynojet dyno. But I had some idle issues that the Tuneboy just couldn't solve. So in desparation I went to a friend of mines Dynojet dyno and we worked at solving the problem (it turned out to be a faulty ecu that the dealership have agreed to change). But we did a couple of full throttle pulls and it gave 265 bhp corrected (again .98 ) thats 270.4 actual bhp.
Two Dynojet dyno's, his is newer than mine by about 15 years, but 12.5% power difference. I think I'm going to grease my bearings!!! I tested on mine again today and got the same results. WHAT DO YOU BELIEVE?
 
parts

Was seriously considering the supercharger for the longest time, but am real concerned about the long term survivability of the reset of the bike, engine, trannie, etc. as it was not designed to have that kind of power pulling at all its little bits.

I like speed, power and uniqueness and no doubt the supercharger would fit that bill.

But, what else is going to have to be changed either up front, or down the road 6 months because of it?

just my ponderings....
 
NO PROBLEMS ENGINE/TRANS WISE TO DATE. I suppose if you drag race it you will find the weaknesses.
 
blowme said:
We've been fitting a lot of R3 supercharger kits lately. last week we fitted a kit to a vertually new 700 mile old bike. It performed quite well with 235 corrected (.98 ) bhp on our Dynojet dyno. But I had some idle issues that the Tuneboy just couldn't solve. So in desparation I went to a friend of mines Dynojet dyno and we worked at solving the problem (it turned out to be a faulty ecu that the dealership have agreed to change). But we did a couple of full throttle pulls and it gave 265 bhp corrected (again .98 ) thats 270.4 actual bhp.
Two Dynojet dyno's, his is newer than mine by about 15 years, but 12.5% power difference. I think I'm going to grease my bearings!!! I tested on mine again today and got the same results. WHAT DO YOU BELIEVE?
I use three different dynos and get three different results. IMO, the total HP and torque figures are not that important, it's the increase of HP and TQ you get with each mod ( with the same dyno of course ).
 
Jethro said:
blowme said:
We've been fitting a lot of R3 supercharger kits lately. last week we fitted a kit to a vertually new 700 mile old bike. It performed quite well with 235 corrected (.98 ) bhp on our Dynojet dyno. But I had some idle issues that the Tuneboy just couldn't solve. So in desparation I went to a friend of mines Dynojet dyno and we worked at solving the problem (it turned out to be a faulty ecu that the dealership have agreed to change). But we did a couple of full throttle pulls and it gave 265 bhp corrected (again .98 ) thats 270.4 actual bhp.
Two Dynojet dyno's, his is newer than mine by about 15 years, but 12.5% power difference. I think I'm going to grease my bearings!!! I tested on mine again today and got the same results. WHAT DO YOU BELIEVE?
I use three different dynos and get three different results. IMO, the total HP and torque figures are not that important, it's the increase of HP and TQ you get with each mod ( with the same dyno of course ).


Given the above;
I have limited time and funds, no access to a dyno (daresay I could find one if it's critical to maximising the benefits of other mods) to fine tune and limited knowledge.
I have an 04 with Progressive 440s, CAT delete (Triumph), ToRs and 16,000 miles on the clock.
I don't see the advantage of rear sets as the frame lugs are already getting a bit of stick.
From the fragments I've gleaned from the more adventurous amongst the frequenters of this forum I presume my next investment should be into triple K & Ns (or Hombre's Ram Air) and Tuneboy.
What do you think?
Most of my riding is a couple of hours grabbed between other commitments to go play tick with sports bikes.
 
Back
Top