I remember when the 961 Commando was launched at the NEC bike show way back when. I was really excited to go and see it.
It was the main thing I wanted to do at the show that year and I was fortunate because I was given an exhibitors pass also that year, as I had volunteered to help man the Moto Guzzi Club GB show stand, so I was able to go over to the Norton stand before the show opened in order to get a really close look at the bike while the place was a ghost town.
When I got to the stand I was in luck, as I was offered a chance to sit on the two bikes (standard 961 and the SE model) which wasn't all that possible to do at the show if you were an ordinary show goer.
I have to say that personally I was very disappointed, due to one specific aspect and that was ergonomics.
I climbed on them and it felt all wrong for my shape and size. I really wasn't expecting it and I think that's why it had a big impact on my memory of the Norton.
Many years later I received an invitation from Norton to attend the presentation evening for the Dommie Racer, and the same thing happened to me. I sat on the Dommie Racer and my knees didn't fit the shapes in the sides of the tank etc... It wasn't made for me at all.
I don't as a general rule find ergonomics to be a huge problem unless bikes are really extreme, like say on a full on race bike, which does feel challenging when you first settle into the riding position, but the 961 was, for me, feeling like a square peg in a round hole.
That said, I have to confess that i've never actually ridden any of those Nortons. I love the styling and the whole idea of Norton ownership through rose tinted historical spectacles.
The Dommie Racer has styling to die for and I would have one as a piece of art in a heartbeat, but I know I wouldn't enjoy riding it, purely on ergonomic grounds.
Maybe the ergonomics have been changed on the very latest bikes, but my gut feeling says otherwise.