After receiving some PM from some members here I looked over the conversations between Richard an I.
There may be some misunderstandings between us both.
My question was specifically about a formula for weight to psi for car tires.
Richard attempted to explain to me the abs question which does not involve me, I don't have abs.
His response was very similar to something that I have read somewhere but can't find now. Similar enough that I felt that he had copied it. I can't find it now so I apologies for the plagiarism accusation.
In post 46 I attempted to poke at Richard with the "combative" comment. I did not mean to provoke anger. I was hoping for a sarcastic response in return. Nothing more!!
This comment was followed by a "*** off" and attack on my intelligence, #56, that I felt was way out of line.
Then in 59 I felt that I was being called a lier. That hit a nerve with me where I became unusually rude in post 67,68 & 69.
Looking back at those 3 post I feel that my comments were unnecessarily harsh and I am embarrassed with my rude behavior.
So now publicly apologize to Richard and all others for my behavior.
I'm still at a loss as to why my comment in 46 was taken as an attack.
I will be more careful to note my intent in any comments that could be taken out of context, by using the appropriate smilie face.
@CanberraR3
You do not have to respond to this in any way. Your opinion about me is yours and mine are mine. I do not harbor any hate for you. I will remain confused about your frame of thought and I will be very cautious how I respond to you.
For all of those that felt that this went in the wrong direction, you are correct. Both Richard and I seem to have misunderstood each other. I apologize to all of you for my "combative" behavior.
