Compiled Dynos, I was bored

[IMFASTTOO]

If it's right the front will lose traction in 3rd, & 4th too.
Nothing like feeling the front tire go light at 150 mph

THATS COMING FROM POPA WHEELY HIMSELF

 

[Claviger]

Is that Deadpool I see?

It is indeed. I figured if there's one piece of non-go fast bling that's acceptable, that's certainly it!

I feel a little dumb for not checking this issue earlier, it's not the first time my bike has had it, he gave it back to me like this before but I never bothered to check this time.

Cracked off 141 testing, felt great, smoother at full throttle than when it was limited at 70%. It's kinda fun being able to wrap the speedo and have a WHOLE GEAR left lmfao. Before it had a weird vibration i chalked up to just having bigger cams and making more power, that vibration's gone at full throttle now and its smooth again.

Of course my part throttle map is WAY off now lol, to be expected, but the full throttle area's good in 1st through 3rd, 4th and 5th need a bit of work on the big end over 6k.

 

[IMFASTTOO]

Good work and very interesting! Looks like the Nev/CES combo gives the best overall low torque and high HP (N/A engine). Seems they beat the both Carpenter packages up to 6250 RPM in TQE and HP. Soo unless you are looking for top end power for drag racing or all out max HP, that's the way to go!

MORE like if you want to win races the CARPENTER PACKAGES ARE THE WAY TO GO

 

[Claviger]

Did you remove the secondary throttle plates ? TAKE THEM OUT NOW

Will yank them tomorrow.

 

[Steel]

It is indeed. I figured if there's one piece of non-go fast bling that's acceptable, that's certainly it!

I feel a little dumb for not checking this issue earlier, it's not the first time my bike has had it, he gave it back to me like this before but I never bothered to check this time.

Cracked off 141 testing, felt great, smoother at full throttle than when it was limited at 70%. It's kinda fun being able to wrap the speedo and have a WHOLE GEAR left lmfao. Before it had a weird vibration i chalked up to just having bigger cams and making more power, that vibration's gone at full throttle now and its smooth again.

Of course my part throttle map is WAY off now lol, to be expected, but the full throttle area's good in 1st through 3rd, 4th and 5th need a bit of work on the big end over 6k.

If anything the Carp motor is smoother above 3000 than stock. Holding it at 5000 or even 6000 rpms for a time it is smooth. If there is any vibration, that's a sign of problems. Glad you got it sorted out, can't wait to see what she does on the dyno.

BTW if you only took her to 141 then you should have 2 gears left.

 

[Tripps]

If it's right the front will lose traction in 3rd, & 4th too.
Nothing like feeling the front tire go light at 150 mph

One cool night on cold tires, I thought my tranny went, 3rd gear full throttle roll on at 70 or so, I had nothing, tried a couple more times, then I realized the rear tire was spinning, I was running the stock 180 rear tire at the time.

 

[Claviger]

3 hour block scheduled to have a full TuneECU session done with Nels, sadly, not until NEXT Friday.

At least itll be done right!

 

[BigKel]

Be good if you get another 30% out of it

 

[Claviger]

30% isn't going to happen, but I did some fuel table analysis comparing the 70% column to the 100% column fuel values, since it was pretty much spot on pre-fix and was close, but a little lean, post-fix. The 100% column is roughly 12-15% higher, so 12-15% more airmass = the leaner AFRs, so I'm estimating I'm actually flowing somewhere between 15 and 20 percent more air. I know the relationship isn't linear, but Id guess I'm about right where I initially expected to be, 175lb-ft peak (ish) and 235 whp (ish), peaking torque at 6000 and HP at 7400-7600.

If it breaks 230 with the air filter strapped on, I'll be very happy, if it breaks 240 I'll be ecstatic as it will fully validate my original theory when I stared down the engine mods road taking my slightly different path. The 230 mark on a low 900 lb bike (rider included) is enough to go deep 9s with a good rider, and the bikes only getting lighter as time goes on. There's still another 40lbs I can cut off the bike very easily.

 

[IMFASTTOO]

30% isn't going to happen, but I did some fuel table analysis comparing the 70% column to the 100% column fuel values, since it was pretty much spot on pre-fix and was close, but a little lean, post-fix. The 100% column is roughly 12-15% higher, so 12-15% more airmass = the leaner AFRs, so I'm estimating I'm actually flowing somewhere between 15 and 20 percent more air. I know the relationship isn't linear, but Id guess I'm about right where I initially expected to be, 175lb-ft peak (ish) and 235 whp (ish), peaking torque at 6000 and HP at 7400-7600.

If it breaks 230 with the air filter strapped on, I'll be very happy, if it breaks 240 I'll be ecstatic as it will fully validate my original theory when I stared down the engine mods road taking my slightly different path. The 230 mark on a low 900 lb bike (rider included) is enough to go deep 9s with a good rider, and the bikes only getting lighter as time goes on. There's still another 40lbs I can easily cut off the bike very easily.

YES bet your excited finding the throttle problem did you get out and get in a good ride with the new found HP ?