Anticipation is killing me...

Anthony,
Was this done using Tune ECU?
 
Anthony,
Was this done using Tune ECU?

That is the tune @Penner posted awhile back. I do believe he tunes with TuneECU

Correcting for 11% difference, if correct as suggested by the interwebz. Pretty good, in my estimation, for not having the header on yet. *EDIT* And the bear claw was on, so air flow restricted some.

166.237 TQ
151.267 HP
 
About 150 rwhp is what you usually get with these modifications.
Don´t worry about the bearclaw. It is hardly any restriction with Ramair.
But you should get the map adjusted. It is a good basis for this tuning, but it will probably run lean at higher revs and loads.
It should be something like 5% from 3000-4000 and about 10% from 4000 to rev limit.
You can use the map and just add it in the F-Trim tables for a test.
 

Once I get near a dynotuner I trust with TuneECU, I will have them make the adjustments. Short term I think I will pick up a PC V and AutoTuner to help with the lean at upper revs.
 
Next dyno run will still be with TuneECU only. Simply for the sake of knowing what the Viking header alone adds to the power numbers. After will be tuned with the PC V (& AT). The mechanic I use is Mustang and DynoJet certified and is just starting with TuneECU. He informed me this morning he is going to pick up the TuneBoy apparatus and learn that as well.

He has over 20 years tuning experience. I'm sure he will pickup the nuances of triumph tuning rather quick.
 

I see now, says the blind old man!
If I now understand, you just had a couple pulls on a dyno after inserting a tune from Penner.
Correctamundo?
 
I’ve had the tune and other bits on for awhile. I just wanted to see what it was doing before the Viking header install.