Tune for a 2012 Rocket

[Rock It]

Hi I'm about to install a viking silencer (with stock header) and ramair filter.

Would anyone have a tune that would suit my 2012 Roadster III

Cheers
Marco

 

[Joesmoe]

Common guys, a little help here, please?

 

[crashpete]

Give Hanso a pm.

 

[rng3]

Have you looked in the "Resource section" to see if a suitable tune is there?
Of course 1st thing will be to make a copy of the bikes original tune and save it to a safe location.
I would suggest once you have a new tune to try use the "compare" function of TuneEcu to compare the tables / settings with what you have to make sure the changes are what you want.

HansO is taking a well deserved break right now from supplying tunes but the list of tunes on both this site and the TuneEcu site are growing.


Rick

 

[Joesmoe]

Alright, I'll add two cents, only thanks to having slept in a Holiday Inn last night.

Much of the discussion about maps has centered around the Touring model as Triumph chose a high torque "down low" - less power high bias. So for the Touring owners, there is much more untapped potential and thus easier to notice a seat- of- the-pants difference without paying too much attention.

For the Roadster, my sense is the mental calculation is different. The potential gain is less, and easier in a relative sense to mess things up than improve.

For the Roadster, it probably makes sense to make the extra effort to find a competent dynamometer and seek incremental changes based on actual measurements.

 

[Rock It]

Give Hanso a pm.

I thought about that but I read a post where Hanso asks people to reduce contact because he's so busy with his real life.

 

[1olbull]

Alright, I'll add two cents, only thanks to having slept in a Holiday Inn last night.

Much of the discussion about maps has centered around the Touring model as Triumph chose a high torque "down low" - less power high bias. So for the Touring owners, there is much more untapped potential and thus easier to notice a seat- of- the-pants difference without paying too much attention.

For the Roadster, my sense is the mental calculation is different. The potential gain is less, and easier in a relative sense to mess things up than improve.

For the Roadster, it probably makes sense to make the extra effort to find a competent dynamometer and seek incremental changes based on actual measurements.

RE: R3R, NOPE!
When I put in a Hanso tune with my 2780 K&Ns and TORs into my new 2012 R3R the improvement was VERY seat pants NOTICEABLE - and in a WOOD sort of way!
When I had the bike dyno-tuned by Nels there was even more seat pants noticeable improvement.
When I went with CES headers and a Nels dyno-tune, another 10 RWHP appeared along with seat pants WOOD!
When I went with the Ram Air, there was a slight improvement on the dyno, but not seat pants noticeable.

 

[Rock It]

Alright, I'll add two cents, only thanks to having slept in a Holiday Inn last night.

Much of the discussion about maps has centered around the Touring model as Triumph chose a high torque "down low" - less power high bias. So for the Touring owners, there is much more untapped potential and thus easier to notice a seat- of- the-pants difference without paying too much attention.

For the Roadster, my sense is the mental calculation is different. The potential gain is less, and easier in a relative sense to mess things up than improve.

For the Roadster, it probably makes sense to make the extra effort to find a competent dynamometer and seek incremental changes based on actual measurements.

Yes I'm thinking on getting a professional to do it.