Mitchcpc
Supercharged
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2007
- Messages
- 260
Question
Looks like we have some pretty smart folks here on this issue (myself not being one of them) so I'll solicit some info on what I observe.
I removed my secondaries and my gas consumption increased, my MPG went from about 30 to about 26 miles per gallon. Yet I note a common side effect of removing the secondaries may be (possibly) a "leaner" condition. Just trying to understand in not too technical terms how more gas to go the same distance can be leaner. In my view it appears that the more air is also drawing more fuel. Not so?
Seems to me that ATRE would have the same effect, or how does the ATRE react differently when opening the secondaries that prevents a possible "lean" condition?
I appreciate all the valuable knowledge sharing on this site.
Dependent upon the responses I may be sticking the secondaries back in this weeknd and getting the ATRE (GiPRO). Was that red or blue locktite I need?
Looks like we have some pretty smart folks here on this issue (myself not being one of them) so I'll solicit some info on what I observe.
I removed my secondaries and my gas consumption increased, my MPG went from about 30 to about 26 miles per gallon. Yet I note a common side effect of removing the secondaries may be (possibly) a "leaner" condition. Just trying to understand in not too technical terms how more gas to go the same distance can be leaner. In my view it appears that the more air is also drawing more fuel. Not so?
Seems to me that ATRE would have the same effect, or how does the ATRE react differently when opening the secondaries that prevents a possible "lean" condition?
I appreciate all the valuable knowledge sharing on this site.
Dependent upon the responses I may be sticking the secondaries back in this weeknd and getting the ATRE (GiPRO). Was that red or blue locktite I need?