Had a play today

The chap from Triumph is 4ft 6in in the video
 
What is so small?
Aren't the wheel bases about the same?
I can honestly say - and I've ridden one for an afternoon - they are lower, when you sit on one the rear wheel seems closer ( due to no rear mudguard) They are or seem more cramped - but this is my opinion. I do however like the GT. Being as the tank is smaller - it does not feel so imposing - try one when you can.
 
I'm not love with that rear in either.
I like I like that my roadster has the capability of putting on panniers and a rear fender bag for making long cross country trips. In 5 minutes or less I can have it back to be at a street monster.
Depending on lean angle comparison, being lower is a good thing for the guy with a 29" inseem, like yours truly.
 
They are doing a full pannier set for the GT..
 
Again with the 40KG lighter! if we want a sports bike that drifts around in the wind on the highway get a speed triple. It will handle better and be easier to move around when in neutral.

I actually like having a heavy planted bike. I also have a 1997 fireblade for days when I want to road race.
one thing I noticed with my R3 Classic is that its a lot easier to move around than the Pan European I had.

for me the cruiser/muscle bike is about presence and comfort on long journeys. If I want to be quick I jump on the Blade.
 
Ditto !
 
I think it is an optical impression that the bike is smaller. I am sure the truly smaller fuel tank is part of the reason it appears smaller.
 

Hows that "blade" for riding cross country to the twisties?
 
I never felt comfortable on mine, sold it last summer.