Exhaust dyno graphs

.....And my old 6-volt VeeDub when I carried a torch so that I could nip round the front occasionally to see if the headlights were on.......
 

Well actually Bruce, 95.65 yards per second.
For the detection, identification and decision phase, the .8 seconds would be in the ball park. However, the response phase, moving to and applying the brakes including lag time would add another .7 seconds or so.

Perception response time (PRT) will vary based upon the type of situation, eccentricity and complexity of the detection and identification phase.
For a general rough daylight perception estimate start with 1.5 seconds. Usually between 1.5 and 2 seconds in the daylight and around 2 to 2.5 seconds at night.
You are showing your age a little as it was back in the 60s that .75 second was the "rule of thumb" estimate for perception response,
PRT went up 1.0 second in the 70s, then as research and understanding improved it went to 1.5 seconds in the 80s.

PRT is usually a little quicker riding a motor than driving a cage; but, the increased time of using two brakes balances both of them out and naturally the use of both brakes on a motor is paramount.
BTW - very cute your use of "yards". You really wanna be a 'Merican, I reckon.
 
Was taught imperial system at school. Australia didn't change to metric until about 1975. I still have to convert measurements back to imperial in my head to visualize how long something is. Like 2.4 meters that's roughly 8 feet or 100 ml is roughly 4 inches. When working in my shed I tend to use both I work in millimeters when doing presice work. All my tapes have both imperial and metric.
 
Since I had the CES headers & collector pipe mounted this week, my butt dyno felt a major increase in power. But now I got the dyno results, and there is something interesting in this curve.

The "before" curve looks just like Nev's dead stock curve, with the stock bump at 5500 still in place?! My secondaries should be open at all times due to TuneEcu. So what's that bump?

The "after" curve got it sorted out, more or less. 156,5 hp looks like a very nice result, cause the TOR's are still in place - BUT could it be that I missed the point on how to get rid of that bump?




2014 R3R
Before: Ramair, TORs, TuneEcu (secs open 100%, rev limit 6700, top speed 260), PC3 custom dyno tune. 139,3 hp
After: same setup + CES headers & collector pipe, new dyno tune in PC3. 156,5 hp.

I would be really happy to get some guru advice on this.
Thanks!
 
Sorry for the post on a three year old thread, BUT this comparison test on the same dyno is AWESOME!
Sure would like to see a graph line up there with the others for a CES!!!
How bout dat, bloke in a steel shed???
 
It is not up to me. If some one comes in with the pipe on and I tune it , I can cross reference the graphs. Send 'em in big bull..
 
1olbull said:
Sorry for the post on a three year old thread, BUT this comparison test on the same dyno is AWESOME!
Sure would like to see a graph line up there with the others for a CES!!!
How bout dat, bloke in a steel shed???
Click to expand...
Tin shed, don't know about America but over here tin and steel same thing but different
 
Neville Lush said:
It is not up to me. If some one comes in with the pipe on and I tune it , I can cross reference the graphs. Send 'em in big bull..
Click to expand...

So then youse Aussies with the CES take a rip over to the "tin shed" and lets all see how it stacks up!!!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Vandemon exhaust defect?
Replies
4
Views
346
chadster54321
Exhaust availability in US
Replies
3
Views
354
atomsplitter
TORS exhaust
2
Replies
11
Views
836
Kevin frazier
In need of wiring install tips for Vandemon exhaust before i start
Replies
2
Views
249
AzRocketman
Carbon buildup? Jardines headers and exhaust. Hagon nitros.
Replies
3
Views
627
Mongler07
Menu
Log in
Register