eka
.020 Over
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2023
- Messages
- 18
- Ride
- Triumph Rocket 3 2021
I have a bad habit to reprogram ECU all the time and try this and that. I just noticed, that i have reprogrammed ECU over 100 times and was like wtf. Better stop and maybe i share what i have done, so you don't have to be dork like me.
Anyways, original ignition map sucks. Values goes here and there too. I guess it is optimised for emission with restricted throttle valves. No way the maximum power comes under 30 degrees ignition advance in this big cylinders. Also low end was too lazy into my taste. Now the bike feels pretty much how i want it to be and got nice gain in useful areas. It is not dynoed, except with my accurate butt dyno. lol
If you look maps in graphic mode, you can see how crazy hasslings those are. I made them all pretty.
I have 31018 map myself, use European 95E lower octane and stock bike (except DNA-filter). I downloaded all TuneEcu maps for different regions and imported in those all my tune for F, I, ETV and AFR. It looks like all those had the same maps... at least those which i checked. I tried to attach maps here, but it's restricted to ten files. If you want to try my crazy unrestricted maps, here is download link:
Eka's pretty maps V1 – Google Drive
Just select the map with the same number that TuneEcu shows from your bike.
If you want to try, notice that ignition advance is much earlier, different fuel and lower octane than 95E might cause detonation/knocking/pinging. I managed to have it few times before got it pretty good. If you hear like pinging noise, turn back home and adjust whole ignition map couple degrees lower, copy it to all gears and test again. Fuelling is probably a bit too rich and with dyno might find couple ponies more, but i have not easy access for that. It would be amazing, if somehow could get precise fuelling maps in my base maps.
And of course, you test maps at your own risk.
Anyways, original ignition map sucks. Values goes here and there too. I guess it is optimised for emission with restricted throttle valves. No way the maximum power comes under 30 degrees ignition advance in this big cylinders. Also low end was too lazy into my taste. Now the bike feels pretty much how i want it to be and got nice gain in useful areas. It is not dynoed, except with my accurate butt dyno. lol
If you look maps in graphic mode, you can see how crazy hasslings those are. I made them all pretty.
I have 31018 map myself, use European 95E lower octane and stock bike (except DNA-filter). I downloaded all TuneEcu maps for different regions and imported in those all my tune for F, I, ETV and AFR. It looks like all those had the same maps... at least those which i checked. I tried to attach maps here, but it's restricted to ten files. If you want to try my crazy unrestricted maps, here is download link:
Eka's pretty maps V1 – Google Drive
Just select the map with the same number that TuneEcu shows from your bike.
If you want to try, notice that ignition advance is much earlier, different fuel and lower octane than 95E might cause detonation/knocking/pinging. I managed to have it few times before got it pretty good. If you hear like pinging noise, turn back home and adjust whole ignition map couple degrees lower, copy it to all gears and test again. Fuelling is probably a bit too rich and with dyno might find couple ponies more, but i have not easy access for that. It would be amazing, if somehow could get precise fuelling maps in my base maps.
And of course, you test maps at your own risk.
