I'm 6'2.5", but, only a 34" inseam. I can definitely see where someone at 36"+ would want the extra leg room, I think my 34" legs are about as long as would feel natural on the stock roadster location.
Even short blokes like me 6'1 enjoy the Touring seating and full foot boards, being able to stretch out is great for long runs, I rode a mates Roadster a few weeks ago and ended up with a cramp in my right hip after a 2hour ride, even he liked the Touring's comfortable riding position,
I reckon I'd adapt to outstreched legs while touring, but, as @MikeDeY can attest, I like to corner... fast... loss of mid controls, at least for me, is not in any way an option.
I reckon I'd adapt to outstreched legs while touring, but, as @MikeDeY can attest, I like to corner... fast... loss of mid controls, at least for me, is not in any way an option.
Always great when people find their preferred ergos, congrats. Looks like a great install.
That said, another Touring pilot here, I absolutely made the right choice in the model lineup. For better balance while cornering, just put the toes on the rear part of the footboard. For relaxed cruising, rest your heels on the front of them, and plenty of room to move around between the two extremes. My inseam should also be 34-ish in ye olde imperial "three barleycorns based" units.
You can see from the other two bikes what I'm use to. xxxhttp://imgur.com/a/OVhIh .There is even a picture of my tall ass in that album standing in front of the Full Throttle Saloon in Sturgis. I have some long legs. Before I just changed to the forward controls my right foot spent nearly 100% of the time on the highway pegs and my left only came down to shift.