Evap Canister Removal Question

My understanding from Tom (TuneECU Tom) and he from Alain. Was that the tunes we see are really only a part of the whole ECU content.

For this reason I'm not entirely sure that many of the maps out there are necessarily as good as they may at first seem. Triumph has made changes (I'm told) in other areas of the ECU. This is reflected in the substitution of non-modified OEM maps for newer versions with different base map numbers.

I'm not questioning the TUNING work. But wonder if maybe the part should be carried across into newer OEM base tunes. Honestly I do not know. But I did read that the newer OEM maps have other beneficial differences.
 


To fix the decel there's a number of threads devoted to the topic. Bsically you have to fatten the 3 L tables (Tuneboy) which are the last 6% of throttle. The pop disappears when you up the bottom of the tables 10% to 15%. The .net site has a great tutorial on it.
 
barbagris said:
Well - that might have something to do with the rider's (how shall I put this) bulk.
Click to expand...

Brave talk from a boney-assed, wine-jug-suckin' guy who has to hide out in the bowels of Europe so he can rest his gimpy wrist.





I'm not fat, Chris. I just have a really big head.
 
GorgeRider said:
Brave talk from a boney-assed, wine-jug-suckin' guy who has to hide out in the bowels of Europe so he can rest his gimpy wrist.





I'm not fat, Chris. I just have a really big head.
Click to expand...


Sure you don't want to go with: "I call that bold talk from a one-eyed old fat man?"
 
atomsplitter said:
Sure you don't want to go with: "I call that bold talk from a one-eyed old fat man?"
Click to expand...

I didn't say I was original.

I just got back from a 100 mile run with the Danish tune for those mods. In a couple of words.............. HOLY SHIIIIIIITTT.

As Warp says, it "pulls like a freight train." fuel mileage went from 36-38 to 45 mpg. I had to go buy a fancy set of $15 ear plugs just to show Ol' Blue some committment to her new configuration. She's happy, now. The dyno numbers from the Danish guys (listed on the .net site) put this tune at 152 h.p. and about 165 torques. I think Ol' Blue is pretty close to that.

Today's Weird Stuff:

1). The odometer is messed up. After exactly 90 miles (as measured by mile markers), the trip meter showed 72.7 miles.

2). Because the odo is messed up, I have no faith that the speedo is anywhere near accurate. I rode a back-country highway, so there was no means to judge by watching other traffic. And I didn't put a stopwatch on it.

3). Fuel gauge is also messed up. The half full mark used to be right at 100 miles. Today, it read half full at 65 miles (tripmeter indicated). All with an increase in fuel mileage from 36 to 45 mpg.

Now I have to figure out if I can use TuneECU to get the instrument cluster to do things with some degree of accuracy.

Any hints, guys?
 
Where do you guys get these fuel consumption figures from I am back with standard pipes and cat delete secondaries removed and I am lucky if I GET 25MPG
but I do cane it everywhere.
 
valmacmiami said:
Where do you guys get these fuel consumption figures from I am back with standard pipes and cat delete secondaries removed and I am lucky if I GET 25MPG
but I do cane it everywhere.
Click to expand...


It's in the wrist you get economy. I get 33 mpg day-to-day. Herd ridining I get 50 mpg. Back roads about 28 mpg.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Cylinder liner removal
2
Replies
11
Views
561
Gerald
Gearbox rebuild question
Replies
0
Views
138
bebsy
Tyre removal
Replies
9
Views
729
Doc Roc
Backrest Question
2
Replies
12
Views
813
1olbull
Rocket 3 GT Lift or Jack for Tire Removal
2
Replies
17
Views
1K
Kevin frazier
Menu
Log in
Register