Bike Down, need to choose next bike

[Last resort]

Taken down on the m25 (London orbital) and the poor bike ('12 Roadster) is a write off. I've survived and as soon as the DVLA allow me back on the road, I'll need to decide.... Upgrade to the 3 gt or stay with the original? Looking for thoughts from those that have owned and ridden both

 

[Rockatansky]

For me the old one is something like a dinosaur - when you love it, you do so.

If you look for the more modern part, sure the 3 is the better choice, while I would always recommend to use the pegs of the R on a GT. I do not like the position... and I recommend the Quick Shifter - one of the best I ever rode...

 

[Jagster]

Sorry to hear that.
Another Rocket perhaps to never be on the road again...also sad.

I've never ridden a 2.3 Rocket but one thing I can say that might be relevant to your choice is......if carrying a passenger with luggage is something you like do more than once in a blue moon, stick with the 2.3.
If not, then I think you might find that once you've ridden the 2.5 Rocket, you'll be ruined for the 2.3 after that, because they are very different beasts dynamically.
That said, the 2.3 has begun to reach that age where it's now being seen as more of a classic rather than a competitor to the newer model, so in that context, it depends a lot on what your riding style is and in where your heart lies.

 

[Dr.D]

There are so many bikes out there to choose from so the question as posed is difficult to answer. Are staying with Triumph and the Rocket? Both motors are good but the new six speed is quite superior to the old 2.3. Most all technical aspects of the new bike like handling and braking are improved. Do ride one asap to see for yourself.

I also the Indian motorcycles. Good hunting.

 

[Rockatansky]

Oh, if we also talk about alternatives: more bike for the money than with a BMW r18 in all its version is actually not possible. I love my B...

 

[atomsplitter]

The Gen 1 bikes are really good, but the Gen 2 is much better. First, it's lighter by almost 100 pounds, second it has more power everywhere in the rev range when properly tuned (i.e. Penner or a dyno). The Gen2 has more features standard that were accessories on the Gen 1 versions. The GT version has adjustable peg position (fore/aft) and heated grips standard. Also comes standard with cruise control and if you feel the need to get frisky you can install a quick shifter that bypasses using the clutch lever. My Gen 1 bike (05 Standard) I converted to a "Classic" with footboards and classic bars. My GT I have no need for the ergo change since it fits me right with the pegs all the way back.

My Gen 1 bike:

My Gen 2 bike:

 

[Journeyman]

I had a ‘12 Roadster and now ‘20 3R. Echoing some of what others have said… 2.3 for passenger and holds more gear (camping, etc.), easier to work on. 2.5 for handling, braking, and cooler look. I load mine with camping gear, but much less comfortable for a passenger. Generally harder to work on, generally. Test ride a 2.5 and you’ll know your answer.

 

[Last resort]

The Gen 1 bikes are really good, but the Gen 2 is much better. First, it's lighter by almost 100 pounds, second it has more power everywhere in the rev range when properly tuned (i.e. Penner or a dyno). The Gen2 has more features standard that were accessories on the Gen 1 versions. The GT version has adjustable peg position (fore/aft) and heated grips standard. Also comes standard with cruise control and if you feel the need to get frisky you can install a quick shifter that bypasses using the clutch lever. My Gen 1 bike (05 Standard) I converted to a "Classic" with footboards and classic bars. My GT I have no need for the ergo change since it fits me right with the pegs all the way back.

My Gen 1 bike:

My Gen 2 bike:

It's beginning to feel like a daft question. I'm going to have to get the latest version if not to scratch that itch. I've always been drawn to the retro style, although I'm gutted it can't be put back on the road, the newer version is progress

 

[Last resort]

I had a ‘12 Roadster and now ‘20 3R. Echoing some of what others have said… 2.3 for passenger and holds more gear (camping, etc.), easier to work on. 2.5 for handling, braking, and cooler look. I load mine with camping gear, but much less comfortable for a passenger. Generally harder to work on, generally. Test ride a 2.5 and you’ll know your answer.

Thanks, you're spot on. Since coming off the wife is reluctant to go pillion so another point the the gt!

 

[Last resort]

There are so many bikes out there to choose from so the question as posed is difficult to answer. Are staying with Triumph and the Rocket? Both motors are good but the new six speed is quite superior to the old 2.3. Most all technical aspects of the new bike like handling and braking are improved. Do ride one asap to see for yourself.

I also the Indian motorcycles. Good hunting.

This last Roadster was my fifth Triumph, had loads of Japanese bikes (mostly years ago) never went Harley or Indian. I'm after more of what I had so I think the GT needs a trial