Good thread!
Like most of you(big assumption here) I enjoy things that "rock" and are "unique"(yeah, yeah and affordable). Boy does the Rocket fit in well with those two qualifiers.
We just had relations(wifey's side) from Germany stay with us. Her cousin Armand(yes it's a Dutch name Jamie) owns a Triumph Daytona 595(I believe he said it was a 1997) and loves it like it's a Porsche or a BMW. To him the Daytona represents the best in it's class. He even said he will never sell it. He's not into cruisers but was impressed(only as a German can be) with my Rocket and the engineering, and how Triumph is dedicated to tri-power. He also saw the BMW Montauk in the Triumph Rocket design and wondered why the Montauk did rather poorly in sales compared to the Rocket. I tried to explain that perhaps the Montauk didn't have the WOW factor along with it's unique design.
Dragging one foot behind to my point, is that we both agreed HD is very popular world wide and will always have a following. Besides the Germans know full well the original HD motor design is simply two cylinders from a early German 12 cylinder airplane. We both agreed though that a HD is iconic and that the rugged, simple, unrefined, motor design has a lot to do with appeal as well as the fact HD did and does make great looking bikes. Being an American status symbol goes a long way too, I think.
He can't understand why HD continues to try and improve a design that is flawed from the start, siting the rear cylinder overheating issue that plaques HD to this day, as well as the poor engine balance problems. He got me there cuz I don't understand that either, unless the design issues are not as bad as Armand makes them out to be.
,.....logically HD has a duty to improve the design(my German side speaking) but if it ain't broke and it sells, why fix it!(my American influence talking now).