Old viking
.020 Over
Hello to you all rocketeers out there.
I'm new to this forum so this is my first contact with you guys.
Since I'm new to the Triumph world as well. I did spend the last two weeks searching the web to seek info about the all new r3 2500 cc
I have been Reading a lot of interesting treads and I come to see this about side carriers.
Now, I have owned 2 fjr1300 , one major issue regarding that bike relates to its weak cast aluminium rear sub frame that is proned to break. Yamaha do not recomend using both sidecarriers and a topbox.
Now stop talking about Yamaha.
The reason I did mention it was because I saw a blueprint of the rear sub frame of this bike and it looked very weak, is it possible that the same issue lurkes whithin this bike.
I have my eyes set on both side carriers and a sissy bar bag as well, maybe thats to much of a load on its tail section.
I'm new to this forum so this is my first contact with you guys.
Since I'm new to the Triumph world as well. I did spend the last two weeks searching the web to seek info about the all new r3 2500 cc
I have been Reading a lot of interesting treads and I come to see this about side carriers.
Now, I have owned 2 fjr1300 , one major issue regarding that bike relates to its weak cast aluminium rear sub frame that is proned to break. Yamaha do not recomend using both sidecarriers and a topbox.
Now stop talking about Yamaha.
The reason I did mention it was because I saw a blueprint of the rear sub frame of this bike and it looked very weak, is it possible that the same issue lurkes whithin this bike.
I have my eyes set on both side carriers and a sissy bar bag as well, maybe thats to much of a load on its tail section.