Hi fellow rocketeers!

Just thought that I'd point out 2 things guys:

First, you are responding to a thread that is nearly 26 months old.

Secondly, that exhaust is not a "3 into 6", it is a 3 into 1 into 2 into 3, so unless its owner performed some alchemy to deal with power loss due to the strangling/convoluted nature of the OEM setup, the power loss will be even more pronounced with the setup as pictured.

I also prefer the looks of a more "balanced" exhaust setup with pipes on both sides of the bike instead of the more efficient and much bigger power-making 3 into 1 design, but, in this case, I don't think that you can have your cake and eat it too on a naturally aspirated R3.


BTW, ThingKing, Bulldog's exhaust components look bone stock down to the collector pipe, which is why I believe that it could only subtract HP & Tq from the motor's output, not add power. In other words, it's all show and no go!
 
Last edited:
WELL yes the stock header is not the best for making HP so its a styling statement and not an attempt to make max HP
 
Hadn't really noticed as I'm on the front....LOL
Have been told by following bikes that it sounds good
Can you ask the guys on the following bikes if they preferred the sound of tors thru stock or thru CES ?
 
Don't think any of the other R3's I ride with have TORs, and mine have been on over a year so really doubt if they would remember the sound.
Wife says sounds MUCH better with the headers on
 
Don't think any of the other R3's I ride with have TORs, and mine have been on over a year so really doubt if they would remember the sound.
Wife says sounds MUCH better with the headers on
Thanks mate !