Claviger

Aspiring Student
Joined
Jul 25, 2014
Messages
6,934
Location
Olympia Washington
Ride
'21 Z H2, '14 R3R, '02 Daytona 955i
@1olbull or others who are good at geometry (I'm terrible at it). I am trying to mentally digest some lean angle stuff. Basically, why do I have to lean so much more on my R3 for a given speed than smaller bikes. A few things are obvious
1: Wheelbase
2: Tire width
3: Steering Geometry

So from what I've read:

1: Wheelbase, effects mostly transitional states, and has a very minor effect in steady state cornering. While the tangent drawn through the axles to center of the circle of a turn will be slightly greater on a longer wheelbase bike, the effect is small.

2: Tire width, from what I've read, has the most effect on steady state cornering lean angle. If that's the case, then a larger tire would need to be leaned over more to track around the same radius curve as a narrower tire, however, the wider tire will simultaneously have a larger contact patch while doing so. The greater contact patch will translate to some increase in traction, providing the ability to lean even further until you touch hard parts down. Alternatively, it would allow throttling out harder and earlier than the narrow tire bike, provided, the increased speed still allows you to stay on a radius that will complete the corner.

3: From what I've read, this has basically no effect on lean angle during steady state cornering, but instead only effects transient action.

Putting that all together, is there a way to calculate what the theoretical (combined rider + bike) lean angle would be for a given turn if you know the geometry numbers and radius of the turn, for example the one below at 75mph?

Highway 2 Sweeper.png
 
To add to the conundrum, center of gravity.

The CoG for the R3R seems to be incredibly low, and I’m wondering if that might be the primary contributor of the required deep angles at speed.

If that’s correct then it would explain why hanging off the bike helps, but doesn’t contribute to the same level as doing so on a sportbike.
 
I’m trying to figure out what to adjust/modify, to lessen required angle if possible.

As it is, I don’t scrape pegs even on the edge of the tire as a result of the mods I’ve made.

I’m happy with how it does, just wondering what would move it another step forward in mid corner speed. I do know I’m getting over to right around 45 degrees from video review before my internal sensors start screaming at me to stop lol.

Guess it’s just the 65” wheel base vs a 55” on a modern super sport.l like you say Nev.
 

Attachments

  • 5F83A3D7-F99F-4FAA-8C6B-87B924DB1906.jpeg
    5F83A3D7-F99F-4FAA-8C6B-87B924DB1906.jpeg
    231.6 KB · Views: 3
  • 4F2864DA-6071-4053-AB6D-DF8716FC0F2B.jpeg
    4F2864DA-6071-4053-AB6D-DF8716FC0F2B.jpeg
    187.7 KB · Views: 3
  • CCA45804-A3F3-40A4-950B-FA9D33626167.jpeg
    CCA45804-A3F3-40A4-950B-FA9D33626167.jpeg
    260.6 KB · Views: 3
  • BD7AE229-AC99-4245-B1F8-08BD671F2B0D.jpeg
    BD7AE229-AC99-4245-B1F8-08BD671F2B0D.jpeg
    352.9 KB · Views: 3
Last edited:
Interesting reading that may give insight into your question. Probably due more to rake/trail angle sport bike versus Rocket.

That’s what I thought, and it certainly helps that I’ve a lot less Trail than stock for agility but the reading I’ve been doing indicates that only effects transient movement.
 
Back
Top