I'm not a mechanic either. I'm a part time diesel dummy, website owner, farmer who just happens to have his journeymans card in tool and die making and just happened to buy machine tools before retiring. It's a hobby.......
I know what works for me. Thats what counts...........
No. well. not necessarily. It's digitally encoded fuel injection so the computer compensates the a/f ratio to make up for less restriction in the intake tract. Just like adding a K&N under the hood of your car. The ECU will adjust the a/f ratio as close as it can to optimum.
The rub on the Rock's are these Captains are altering their digital encoding to the point where it becomes necessary to artificially dial in the A/F ratio in search of horsepower without detonation.
I've been running K&N's right along on my Classic with a Baxter's tune that Gus installed when he rebuilt my motor. I did add a Dobeck analog controller this spring but only to smooth out the midrange, not for power. I'm 61. My basically stock R3 has all the power I need and then some.
There is nothing wrong, either fiscally or longevity wise, going from the stock filter to a K&N or K&N's. The OEM pleated paper filter costs more than one K&N and it's a throw away. the K&N isn't. I've had a K&N in my '97 F350 Diesel since new. It paid for itself 3 times now.
Interesting too, I was concerned too, about dirt getting past the filter on my Powerstroke. That engine is a 9K replacment and it's turbo'd. I coated the intake, intercooler hoses inside with vaseline and check it to see, if any dirt got past the filter (I live on a dirt road). Nothing ever did. That's good enough for me.