Molinoman
Living Legend
After giving the idea a lot of thought (not much else to do over here but to work and think, sleep and eat) I have decided...for now (which means I could change my mind but I doubt it) that if the new Gold Wing isn't "all that" that if/when I get the new Triumph it will be the the R3T.
I looked up as much info on the Roadster as I could find and noticed a couple of things.
1. I like the more "relaxed/cruiser" style of sitting on the Classic which is pretty much duplicated on the R3T. With the Roadster I am sitting more upright, leaning slightly forward, feet will be positioned more rearward.
2. I like my floorboards, on long trips they are good to have. With the Roadstar I'm back to pegs (the new Gold Wing will probably be "pegged" as well).
3. Do I really need 6 more HP (from my current ride) and 18 more ft/lbs of torque?
With the R3T I can still get up and go and will only be at 11 ft/lbs less torque.
4. The colors are only black...and black. I like black, but with a another color added to it, I'm not too keen on only having the blue and blue to choose from but since they will not be carrying over the red/black model for 2010, I may settle for it or get the solid black R3T and do what I was originally thinking of doing with the Roadster, have some one throw some more paint...of a different color...on it.
5. The 2010 R3T will have ABS as an option, the Roadstar has it stock, I'll just order an R3T with ABS.
6. When I get back I can always work on getting a "tourpack" mounted on the luggage rack like a few other enterprising members have done already.
7. I can add a stereo system easier to the R3T than I can a Roadster.
8. Which leaves the only real shortcoming...cruise control, but there are ways around that as well.
Now keep in mind this could all change if I ever sat on a Roadster (my second R&R from now in April or so) and talked myself into "this isn't so bad after all", but for now I'm going to concentrate on getting ready for the R3T.
Dennis
26 dtg Dubai
27 dtg Home
I looked up as much info on the Roadster as I could find and noticed a couple of things.
1. I like the more "relaxed/cruiser" style of sitting on the Classic which is pretty much duplicated on the R3T. With the Roadster I am sitting more upright, leaning slightly forward, feet will be positioned more rearward.
2. I like my floorboards, on long trips they are good to have. With the Roadstar I'm back to pegs (the new Gold Wing will probably be "pegged" as well).
3. Do I really need 6 more HP (from my current ride) and 18 more ft/lbs of torque?
With the R3T I can still get up and go and will only be at 11 ft/lbs less torque.
4. The colors are only black...and black. I like black, but with a another color added to it, I'm not too keen on only having the blue and blue to choose from but since they will not be carrying over the red/black model for 2010, I may settle for it or get the solid black R3T and do what I was originally thinking of doing with the Roadster, have some one throw some more paint...of a different color...on it.
5. The 2010 R3T will have ABS as an option, the Roadstar has it stock, I'll just order an R3T with ABS.
6. When I get back I can always work on getting a "tourpack" mounted on the luggage rack like a few other enterprising members have done already.
7. I can add a stereo system easier to the R3T than I can a Roadster.
8. Which leaves the only real shortcoming...cruise control, but there are ways around that as well.
Now keep in mind this could all change if I ever sat on a Roadster (my second R&R from now in April or so) and talked myself into "this isn't so bad after all", but for now I'm going to concentrate on getting ready for the R3T.
Dennis
26 dtg Dubai
27 dtg Home