DEcosse
If it's no Scottish it's CRAP!
*Clutch switch has absolutely nothing to do with Fuel Indication.*
Side stand switch DOES report to the ECU - if sidestand is down & transmission is clicked into gear it kills motor
So if removing then bypass must be wired as if stand was in raised position
I (somewhat) see point of bypassing clutch switch for those who feel pulling the clutch lever to engage the starter is onerous (although personally dont see that it's a big deal);
But what is the 'advantage' of bypassing the sidestand switch? It provides a valuable safety interlock while having no downside
* Edit - I rethought this after initially posting (thinking why would anyone suggest it to be the case)
I don't know for sure but potentially the computation for fuel consumption does not work if/when clutch is pulled (or bypassed); not sure why that would be a factor but potentially it might be the case
So I'm retracting the original statement as being definitive.
Someone (volunteer?) should bypass their switch for test & see if does or not
Side stand switch DOES report to the ECU - if sidestand is down & transmission is clicked into gear it kills motor
So if removing then bypass must be wired as if stand was in raised position
I (somewhat) see point of bypassing clutch switch for those who feel pulling the clutch lever to engage the starter is onerous (although personally dont see that it's a big deal);
But what is the 'advantage' of bypassing the sidestand switch? It provides a valuable safety interlock while having no downside
* Edit - I rethought this after initially posting (thinking why would anyone suggest it to be the case)
I don't know for sure but potentially the computation for fuel consumption does not work if/when clutch is pulled (or bypassed); not sure why that would be a factor but potentially it might be the case
So I'm retracting the original statement as being definitive.
Someone (volunteer?) should bypass their switch for test & see if does or not
Last edited: