R3Owners.Net

Go Back   R3Owners.Net > R3Owners Forums > Rocket Performance

Rocket Performance Turbos, NOS, Superchargers, Exhausts and Any Other High Performance Tips and Tricks

» Featured Photos
by snuffcityrider
by JUNE04R3OWNERUK

Reply
  #1  
Old 03-17-2008, 07:10 PM
hombre's Avatar
Turbocharged
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 665
Question Maximizing Intake Flow

I know many owners have removed their secondary throttle plates, but has anyone else completely removed their secondary throttle rod and plugged the holes in the throttle bodies?

Just curious...
__________________
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-17-2008, 08:14 PM
Sidecar Flip's Avatar
Living Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 20150 Mc Carty Rd. Deerfield, Michigan 49238
Posts: 5,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by hombre View Post
I know many owners have removed their secondary throttle plates, but has anyone else completely removed their secondary throttle rod and plugged the holes in the throttle bodies?

Just curious...
I'll bite.....What did you plug the holes in the casting with? Plastic plug buttons or bondo?
__________________
Flipmeisters Specialty Products
www.flipmeisters.com
Pursuing the never ending quest for cheaper bling.......
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-17-2008, 08:26 PM
.020 Over
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Victor Harbor South Australia
Posts: 27
Yes I have done that to bikes.You know that :-)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-17-2008, 08:31 PM
hombre's Avatar
Turbocharged
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 665
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sidecar Flip View Post
I'll bite.....What did you plug the holes in the casting with? Plastic plug buttons or bondo?
Brass plugs... or was it Play-Doh?
__________________

Last edited by hombre; 03-17-2008 at 08:45 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-17-2008, 08:36 PM
hombre's Avatar
Turbocharged
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 665
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neville Lush View Post
Yes I have done that to bikes.You know that :-)
How many R3s did you setup like that, Nev? Were they high compression bikes? I really think it makes an even bigger difference with forced induction... greater flow.
__________________
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-18-2008, 08:16 AM
.020 Over
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Victor Harbor South Australia
Posts: 27
shafted

only a couple, as folk normally do not want to pay for the time for a small gain.On 150hp I think it was worth just under 1 1/2 hp,removing the sec plates made as much even with them locked open,just cause of the flow disruption they cause.I think difference would be less with forced induction as it will get in anyway.I am guessing though on that.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-18-2008, 10:43 AM
hombre's Avatar
Turbocharged
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 665
My thinking is with forced induction, there is greater disruption to the velocity of the intake flow, resulting in greater loss of throttle response. However, since I've had the throttle rod out since before my supercharger, it's just a theory... not an experience. But think about water... a rock will cause a greater disturbance in the middle of a fast moving stream, than it will in a slow moving stream.
__________________
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-27-2008, 07:58 PM
mjbell1@rcn.com's Avatar
.060 Over
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Framingham, Mass,
Posts: 152
Throttle Body Holes

Way back when I was building my first Honda 450. I took the carbs
and removed the choke plates and shafts from both. Cleaned the
holes and filled them with Aluminum epoxy/paste. After curing,
polished the bung holes. When carbs where at full throttle
there was nothing interfering with air flow through the carbs.
Had nice spun aluminium velocity stacks to top it off. Cold weather
starts where accomplished by covering one of the stacks while you
kicked it over (electric starter, Assembly, cables and battery)
removed to cut weight.
__________________

Well god dam here I am again in Triumph Land.
2007 Rocket III Classic Tourer Cardinal Red/Black.
Current mods include TORS, Cat-Elim,
Secondary butterflies removed, O2 Terminated,
individual K&N's, w/tune.
Other interests include computers, trucks and firearms.
1997 Speed Triple.

Be Well:

mjbell1
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-28-2008, 02:59 PM
hombre's Avatar
Turbocharged
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 665
mjbell

Nice to another performance freak on the forum!

Since I was in the "neighborhood" today... snapped photo. She be flowin' some air!

__________________
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-28-2008, 04:47 PM
Paul Hyland's Avatar
Turbocharged
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: League City TX
Posts: 969
Hombre

I work with centrifugal blowers and air movement systems so let me throw this out to you.
You talked about the rock in water thing, what you have to realize is that the flow in the stream never changes (has no restriction) were as in the intake you have one size opening in the first stage of the intake (filter area) then a smaller hole were it enters the motor. So unless you open that second hole VOLUME threw there is constant. So by putting the a velocity intake on you are changing pressure and speed of flow but not volume threw the secind hole so unless you have a blockage are restriction just before the second intake the rods shouldn't make any kind of noticeable difference.

Look at a garden hose one with the nozzle you adjust by turning. The hose can only deliver a constant volume of water but you can adjust the pressure and speed of flow buy opening or restricting the nozzle but the volume the hose can carry doesn’t change. So say you put a nail threw the hose about 6” up the hose volume at the nozzle with remain constant because of the restriction at the smaller end of nozzle. The small hole can’t move the same volume as the big hole so unless you can get more air threw a small hole than a big hole I don’t think you will notice any kind of difference.
Doe’s any of this make since or am I way off here.

What you need Hombre is a CFD computer modeling program the models flow. You put the design in (in this case a computer model of the R3 intake) and the program shows you how to improve flow. We have one here and it is cool watching how things can change the flow in a machine.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
flow, intake, maximizing


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Air Intake Mods habegaad Rocket Performance 17 03-29-2008 10:00 PM
Air intake backfire pascal General Tech Talk 6 04-09-2007 06:22 PM
looking for intake Paul Hyland BearClaw Corner 0 01-15-2007 02:57 PM
Uni Filter Flow Rate Comparo SteveRed Rocket Performance 6 06-26-2006 01:24 AM
intake cover quintr3 BearClaw Corner 0 06-09-2006 10:12 AM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:07 AM.
© Motorcycles International Group, LLC
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28